Diamond Harbour Adminstartion and TMC are erecting a Bigger Mosque in DH Criminal Court premises illegally to appease the Fundamental Muslims.

Muslim Pressure Groups put compulsion over Diamond Harbour Sub Divisional Office to reconstruct a Bigger Mosque in Diamond Harbour Criminal Court Premises barely illegal.

Hectic ongoing to reconstruct a
Mosque @ Jihadi Hub
in DH Cr. Court Prmises

Raj Khanna from Diamond Harbour || December 23rd 2011 - Under some obnoxious connections of Diamond Harbour local administration and the Islamist groups active in the locality, a hectic process of reconstruction of a bigger Mosque than before is going on in the very protection of the concerned Govt. authorities violating many civic laws and the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.

As per available reports, a RTI activist and local leader of Hindu Samhati, a prominent Hindu Organization in some parts of West Bengal put an application before Sub-divisional Officer (SDO), Diamond Harbour to look into the matter for its right and justified disposal of the same.

As per Order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, all the religious structures/shrines are to removed in a time frame for some reasons as held by the bench of  Justice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Mukundakam Sharma on 31st July 2009.

But, violating all the norms and the Order of the Supreme Court of India, the SDO Diamond Harbour has given the permission and helping the same to reconstruct a bigger Mosque in the premises of Diamond Harbour Criminal Court, with the help of some Muslim Group headed by one Raich Molla of Mandirbazar, South 24 Parganas. Sources said that this Raich Molla has an immense influence over the Diamond Harbour SDO and controls all the tenders etc. to see the interest of local Muslim businessmen and the unauthorized money market. Moreover, this Raich Molla has illegally occupied a portion of a land owned by a Hindu Religious Trust namely "GOPAL JUE TRUST" at Tirtha Kuthir, Hazi Building Para, Diamond Harbour.

This reporter has been able to capture the video footage before and after the demolition (for reconstruction purpose) of the impugned Mosque structure, from where it is evident that a bigger Mosque is going to be erected there with the help some mysterious Islamic funding to reconstruct the same very unlawfully. It has been alleged that a fund of  Rs. 10 lac has been given as bribe to manage the permission of the illegal construction of the mosque and the mosque will be reconstructed with another Rs 5 lac from that mystery source. As a matter of fact the Islamic Groups involved with illegal money market are funding huge amount to construct or reconstruct or to renovate the Mosque all over South 24 Parganas (all over West Bengal also).

The RTI and Hindu activist, Sri Haran Chandra Mondal wanted to know from the authority that :

"(a)        The actual size and type of existing Mosque in question and the proposed reconstructed size and type after reconstruction/renovation of the same.                          

 (b)        The name of the person and the authority who/that passed the related reconstruction/renovation plan of the Mosque in question.

 (c)         The cost of estimated budget for the reconstruction/renovation plan of the Mosque in question and the source to meet the cost.

 (d)        Whether the Sub Divisional Officer, Diamond Harbour has given any permission for the reconstruction/renovation work for the Mosque in written or verbally.

 (e)        Under whose order the Police contingents are guarding the illegal reconstruction/renovation work for the Mosque in question. (Photo enclosed)." 

As per Right to Information Act, 2005, the concerned authority is bound to give the available information within one month after submission of the application with due charges for the same.

It has been gathered that the President and Secretary of the Bar Association of Diamond Harbour Criminal Court, Mohammad Nurul Amin, Advocate and Sri Sudipta Chakroborty, Advocate, respectively are morally helping the Islamic group to erect a bigger Mosque under the Islamic dictum of Trinmool Congress party as they both holds position in the party to see the minority interest even at the cost of violation of rule of the land and the verdit of Hon'ble Supreme court of India.

 

Sitting Supreme Court judge supports the inclusion of Prime Minister's Office within the ambit of Lokpal Bill.

Supreme Court judge wants PM under Lokpal's scanner

PTI / Friday, August 5, 2011 20:33 IST / DNA
 

A sitting Supreme Court judge today supported the inclusion of the Prime Minister's Office within the ambit of Lokpal Bill tabled in Parliament yesterday.

"As a student of law, I see no substance in the debate that the Prime Minister should be outside the (Lokpal) Bill. A public office of such importance cannot shy away from public scrutiny," Justice AK Ganguly said.

The judge was addressing a gathering here on the occasion of the release of a book 'Corruption and Human Rights in India', authored by Professor C Raj Kumar, the Vice Chancellor of OP Jindal Global University.

Pointing out that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had himself expressed his willingness to bring the PMO under the Lokpal's scanner, Justice Ganguly said "more efforts to keep the PM out will add to the suspicion among people."

In his address, Justice Ganguly also criticised the Prevention of Corruption Act, which stipulates sanction by competent authorities before prosecuting any government servant, bureaucrat or politician on charges of corruption.

"The Prevention of Corruption Act, to my mind, is preservation of corruption act. It has a mechanism to protect the corrupt. Without the sanction, the corrupt cannot be prosecuted. Who is to give you the sanction? They (corrupt) do not act individually and they work in a organised way," he said.

Justice Ganguly is also the part of a two-judge bench which had heard a petition by Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy seeking guidelines for the grant of sanctions to prosecute those occupying public offices on the charge of corruption and has reserved its order on the plea.

Fast Caveat : Anna to move SC to check the Govt. hostility in Anti corruption Movements.

Hazare to move Supreme Court against any Ramlila ground-like crackdown from August 16th Fast.
PTI / Sunday, July 17, 2011 18:16 IST || DNA.


Citing the police crackdown on Ramdev and his supporters at Ramlila Ground in Delhi, activist Anna Hazare today said he will approach the Supreme Court seeking its intervention to ensure that the government does "not suppress" his fast on Lokpal issue beginning August 16.

"Government said we will suppress the agitation of Anna Hazare as had been done in the case of Ramdev. Is this democracy or autocracy? You cannot suppress.... That is why we will go to the Supreme Court tomorrow," Hazare said.Holding that the Constitution has given right to every citizen to protest democratically, the anti-corruption activist said he will launch his indefinite fast here from August 16 as announced."The Constitution has given right to every citizen to lodge a protest. We will launch the agitation from August 16," he said.The exercise to work out an agreed draft of the Lokpal Bill between the government and Hazare-led civil society had ended in failure last month after which Hazare had announced that he will go ahead with his August fast.

Hazare has been demanding that the prime minister be brought under the ambit of Lokpal which has been opposed by the government.After nine meetings spread over two months, the joint drafting committee of the two sides concluded its deliberations on a note of disagreement with the government asserting that it could not allow creation of a parallel structure which would be "answerable to nobody".An all-party meet on Lokpal earlier this month had agreed that a "strong and effective" bill should be brought in the Monsoon session of Parliament with consensus that supremacy of Parliament and established procedures be maintained.Police had carried out a crackdown on Ramdev and his supporters, who were agitating against corruption and blackmoney, at Ramlila ground on June 4 night, lobbing tear gas shells. Ramdev was bundled out of Delhi.
Courtesy : PTI & DNA.This is published in the National interest and under citizen's responsibility for awareness generation programme. 

Chidambaram to blame for midnight swoop. SC pulls up Delhi Police for Ramdev crackdown

Apex court questions Delhi Police on Ramdev crackdown

New Delhi, July 11 (IANS) ::  The Supreme Court Monday asked Delhi Police to explain their behaviour and the need to use teargas and baton-charge in a closed enclosure when people were sleeping during yoga guru Baba Ramdev’s protest gathering at the Ramlila Ground here last month.

The apex court bench of Justice B.S. Chauhan and Justice Swatanter Kumar said there were documents and DVDs to show that yoga exercises were undertaken at the camp, and if that was so, what was the justification for police to resort to baton-charge.

Delhi Police chief B.K. Gupta, in an affidavit to the apex court, had said that the permission to use the Ramlila Ground was given for a yoga camp and not for any other purpose.

The court said that it would consider Ramdev’s plea to issue notice to union Home Minister P. Chidambaram on the grounds that the decision to use force against him and his followers at the anti-graft protest was not taken by Delhi Police June 4 but it was taken much earlier at the political level.

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Ramdev, referred to a press release issued by the home ministry and an interview by Chidambaram to Doordarshan in support of his contention that the decision to use force was taken much earlier.

The case would next be heard July 25.

Jethmalani referred to the ministry’s press release June 8 in which Chidambaram said that ‘a decision was taken’ that Baba Ramdev would not be allowed to organise any protest fast or undertake any fast-unto-death at Ramlila Ground and that if he persisted in his efforts to do so he would be ‘directed to remove himself from Delhi’.

The senior counsel said that the minister nearly repeated the same words in his interview with Doordarshan on that day.

Jethmalani said the minister’s comment was nothing but a strong arm tactic of the government and an attempt to gag any protest against corruption.

He wondered how could there be a decision to extern the yoga guru from Delhi.

Jethmalani described the government’s decision and action as ‘murder of democracy in the country’.

He said that Baba Ramdev had the lawful permission to hold dharna and satyagraha.

Delhi Police’s senior counsel Harish Salve said that he was given the permission to hold dharna and satyagraha only at Jantar Mantar.

When Jethmalani pressed for the issuance of a notice to Chidambaram, the court said ‘let them file a rejoinder to your affidavit and at that stage we will consider your prayer to issue notice’.

The court was informed that Delhi’s chief secretary did not file an affidavit on the matter because he was abroad when police evicted the yoga guru.

The judges said that there must have been someone looking after his responsibilities in his absence and ordered that an affidavit should be filed stating what was the need for using force to disperse the gathering.

• Related reading ::  Chidambaram to blame for midnight swoop, Ramdev tells Supreme Court - India - DNA
• Court glare on force on ‘sleeping men’
• SC pulls up Delhi Police for Ramdev crackdown | Supreme Court | Ramdev | The New Indian Express
• SC pulls up Delhi Police for Ramdev crackdown 

Courtesy : All related sources. This is published in the National interest and under citizen's responsibility for awareness generation programme. 

Corruption :: Black Money :: Indian Money in Swiss Bank :: Supreme Court of India.

Black_ Money_SC_4th_July-2011

Full text of judgement of 4 July 2011 by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on Black Money and setting up a Secial Investigation Team lead by two SC judges.

[Reportable | Source : Bharatkalyan97]


 Read full text : Black Money_SC judgement_4th July 2011
Portion :

Related Reading : SC appoints special investigation team to 'follow the money'. UPA, quit governance. 

Black money: Supreme Court's no confidence in government 

Recovering India’s Blackmoney held abroad: Prosecution Team led by Justice Jeevan Reddy 

Courtesy : Related Sources.

This is published in the National interest and under citizen's responsibility.

Black Money Corruption : Bring back people's Money from Swiss Banks.

Black money issue : SC appoints SIT headed by Justice Reddy

Source: PTI  || Date: 7/4/2011 1:50:51 PM || eNews Bharati.

New Delhi, Jul 4 (PTI) : The Supreme Court today appointed a high-level Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by former apex court judge B P Jeevan Reddy to monitor the investigation and the steps being taken to bring back black money stashed away in foreign banks.

Besides Justice Reddy, who will be the chairman of the SIT, the apex court also appointed its former judge, Justice M B Shah as the vice-chairman of the panel. A bench comprising justices B Sudershan Reddy and S S Nijjar directed that the High-Level Committee (HLC) constituted by the government to look into the issue of black money would "forthwith" be a part of the SIT. The bench also directed the government to disclose the names of all the persons who have been issued show cause notices by the authorities in connection with the probe into the black money issue.

The court, however, made it clear that the authorities would not disclose the names of those who have not been investigated in connection with deposits made in foreign banks including Liechtenstein bank. The court passed the order on a petition filed by eminent jurist Ram Jethmalani and others seeking directions to the government to track black money stashed away abroad and bring it back.The apex court directed the government to issue notification forthwith regarding the appointment of SIT and ordered that government machinery to cooperate with it.

The bench, while passing the order, made some hard-hitting observation against the Centre for its "failure" to take proper action against people who have illegally stashed away money in foreign banks. Observing the phenomenon of black money as "extremely dangerous to the country", the court said the quantum of money in foreign banks is a rough measure of "weakness" and "softness" of the nation.The bench said that it was a serious lapse on the part of the government which will have implications on the country's external and internal security.

"We must express serious reservation on the steps taken by the government...It's clear to us that investigation was completely stalled and expedited only after the court's intervention. "It was only upon this court's insistence that proper investigation was conducted," the bench said while referring to Pune stud farm owner Hasan Ali Khan's case. 

The court also asked the SIT to submit a comprehensive action plan to deal with cases relating to the black money issue. Justifying its decision to constitute the SIT, the bench said that in previous cases also the court has been passing such orders to fulfil its constitutional obligation. The court also said that it's not possible for it to be involved in day-to-day investigations in the case as the resources at its disposal were scarce.

The bench said the issue of black money has to be taken with a degree of seriousness and the state is primarily responsible to make all efforts to bring back into the country such wealth and punish people who have stashed away money in foreign banks.

Courtesy : PTI & News Bharati. This is published in the National interest and under citizen's responsibility.

Supreme Court of India holds no interference in Lokpal Bill drafting committee.

SC says no to interference in 
Lokpal bill drafting committee 

SC says no to interference in Lokpal bill drafting committee

Source: Agency | Date: 6/28/2011 3:41:56 PM | eNews Bharati

New Delhi  Jun  28 : In a major development  the Supreme Court said it will not interfere in the constitution of the joint committee for drafting of the Lokpal Bill and termed the petitions "premature".

The Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia decided to adjourn the hearing on three public interest litigations (PILs)  till mid-July. The Apex court didn’t accept the petitioner’s plea that the committee would draft the bill by June 30. Honorable justice said,

“ In one petition filed by Mahan Dal, a political party in Haryana said that a bill of such a great national importance shouldn't be drafted in haste or under pressure from Anna Hazare and others as it would set a bad example. "Whether a decision affecting the whole of the nation can be taken so suddenly without having a public debate on such a national issue of great public importance?

"Whether the government could take an action under the threat or pressure from one of the citizens of the country and whether this would not create a bad precedent for future? "Ultimately the government succumbed to the pressure of Anna Hazare and hurriedly came out with a resolution on April 8 2011," it was said in one of the petitions filed by counsel R K Kapoor. The PIL also said that the composition of the joint drafting committee was totally partisan, arbitrary and not in national interest.

A PIL express fears that enactment of Lokpal would be against  the spirit of Article 50 of the Constitution of India. It will wipe out the separation of the judiciary from the executive.

"A decision affecting the whole nation cannot be taken so suddenly without having a public debate on such a national issue of great public importance. The government cannot take action under threat or pressure from one of the citizens of the country and such succumbing to pressure tactics would create a bad precedent for future,

" it was said in one of the petitions filed.  The petition also said that the joint drafting committee should be expanded and more persons from different fields like women, minorities, media, academics etc. and others be included to give it a un-biased and non-partisan touch. In second petition Kaushal Kishore Shukla, through counsel Jitender Singh, had demanded inclusion of Leader of the Opposition in the drafting panel. In third PIL advocate Manoharlal Sharma challenged the notification but also asked the Apex court to order a CBI inquiry into alleged illegal activities of Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan, the father-son duo.

Govt. of West Bengal should publish the hidden deal of Corruption for Singur Land and Tata Motors.

Supreme Court stays return of Singur land

Source: Agencies | Date: 6/29/2011 1:04:30 PM | eNews Bharati

New Delhi, June 29 : Tata group got some respite from the decision of Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Wednesday stayed the return of land acquired from farmers in Singur in West Bengal for the Tata Motors Nano  project till the final order on the issue by the Calcutta High Court.

The Supreme Court, however, said it will not interfere in the decision.

'The Supreme Court said it will not interfere in the special leave petition but till a further order from Calcutta High Court, no distribution of land will be done,' West Bengal government's lawyer Kalyan Bandopadhyay told reporters.

The newly elected Trinamool Congress government in West Bengal had passed a bill to return the land acquired from farmers who were unwilling to part with it.

The legislation was challenged by Tatas in the Calcutta High Court, which ruled against them. They then moved the apex court.

Given the urgency of the matter, the Supreme Court also asked the Calcutta High Court to give its decision within a month.

iFACT=> It is believed that the TATA group of industries had a suppressed deal with the dethroned Left  Front Govt. to enjoy more facilities by them in West Bengal, which spoiled many acres of two corps fertile lands of the annoyed farmers, whose factual profits and interests were jeopardized by a ruthless and forceful way of land acquisition in Singur for the proposed Nano 4 wheeler factory, hinting a practice of corruption by both the part of Govt and the TATA Motors.